OzLeap works with teams across risk, decisions, operations and capability, where someone has to commit before the picture is complete. We stay from the first question until the answer is working, and we build the tools and training that make the work simpler and more enjoyable.
Why OzLeap exists
Most people who plan, deliver and run things started out loving to build things. Somewhere along the way the joy got buried under repetitive admin, clumsy software and reports nobody reads.
OzLeap exists to bring it back. We work side by side with teams on the decisions that matter, build tools that are a pleasure to use, and make learning feel like play.
OzLeap was founded in Sydney in August 2021. It’s a long road, and every engagement, app and class is a step along it.
Principles guiding our work
Structure before solutions. How problems are framed determines outcomes. The first job is always to slow down and ask: are we solving the right problem?
Minimalism as discipline — removing what doesn’t add value. Complexity is often a symptom of unclear thinking, not a sign of thoroughness.
Mathematical thinking applied carefully in real, messy contexts. Numbers must earn their place. When they do, they add precision and accountability that words alone can’t.
A clear internal standard for what “great” looks like — and the discipline to hold to it even when shortcuts are tempting. Quality is a choice made repeatedly.
These four shape how we do the work. Ten more guide which way we go.
See our values →
Leading OzLeap
Saeed Andalib leads OzLeap. His path runs through both industry and academia: fifteen years working on major investment decisions, risk and delivery; a PhD in decision making under uncertainty; and more than a thousand people trained, including in the University of Sydney’s Strategic Risk Management program.
He is most at home where the picture is incomplete — where assumptions hide in plain sight, trade-offs are unavoidable, and the “obvious” answer often breaks later.
Analysis and judgement usually sit in different people. The value is in having both: enough depth to model a problem properly, enough judgement to know when the model has told you all it can, and enough awareness of how people actually decide to make the answer stick.
Saeed Andalib
Founder · Risk and decision specialist · PhD, PMP
Our team
Specialists in risk, digital strategy, design, software and learning, working together on our services and apps.
In the classroom






Peer-reviewed research
If you’re interested in the bridge between behavioural economics and investment valuation — how real decisions under uncertainty diverge from “textbook” valuation — this paper explores how valuation can better reflect how decisions are actually made.
Read the paperWhat
Investment valuation often assumes one “correct” answer
Based on probabilities and discounting. In real high-stakes decisions, people also judge outcomes relative to a baseline, feel losses more strongly than gains, and vary in comfort with uncertainty.
So what
Ignoring human elements creates a dangerous gap
If valuation ignores these elements, the “best” model on paper produces numbers decision-makers won’t trust or act on — leading to mispricing and weaker investment choices.
Now what
Make risk preferences explicit and transparent
Rather than hiding them inside a vague risk premium. Aim for valuation that is defensible in context: analytically grounded, clear about assumptions, and appropriate for the decision environment.
Work with us
A short conversation is often enough to understand whether we’re the right fit. No pitch — just an honest conversation.
Choose a time